PENERAPAN METODE MONTESSORI BERBANTU MEDIA SANDPAPER LETTERS UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70345/sasangga.v3i1.41Keywords:
Montessori Method;, Snadpaper Lettters Media, Student Learning Outcomes, Elementary SchoolAbstract
This study aims to improve the learning process and students’ learning outcomes through the implementation of the Montessori method assisted by Sandpaper Letters media among first-grade students at Elementary School Negeri 1007 Tanjung Baringin. The study employed a Classroom Action Research (CAR) approach with a two-cycle design consisting of planning, action, observation, and reflection stages. The research participants were 25 first-grade students. Data were collected through observation, learning outcome tests, and documentation. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive quantitative techniques for test results and descriptive qualitative analysis for observational data. The findings indicate changes in students’ learning outcomes from the pre-cycle to Cycle II following the implementation of the Montessori method assisted by Sandpaper Letters. These changes are associated with increased student engagement in learning activities through concrete and multisensory experiences that align with the developmental characteristics of lower-grade elementary students. This study provides empirical evidence that the Montessori method assisted by Sandpaper Letters media, within a CAR framework, can serve as an approach to improving learning practices in lower elementary classrooms.
References
Agustina, A. (2020). Improving early literacy skills through Montessori method. SHEs: Conference Series, 3(3), 1860–1865. https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v3i3.46532
Carlo, G., Mestre, M. V., Samper, P., Tur, A., & Armenta, B. E. (2011). Moral cognitions and emotions as predictors of prosocial behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(6), 872–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.024
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design (4th ed.). Sage.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Gutek, G. L. (2019). Methods of Montessori. Praeger.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332
Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2011). The great balancing act. Mind, Brain, and Education, 5(2), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01114.x
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Berk, L. E., & Singer, D. (2009). A mandate for playful learning in preschool. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195382716.001.0001
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
Lillard, A. S. (2017). Montessori education: A review of the evidence base. NPJ Science of Learning, 2, 11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-017-0012-7
Mangen, A., & Velay, J. L. (2010). Digitizing literacy: Reflections on the haptics of writing. Advances in Haptics, 385–401. https://doi.org/10.5772/8713
Marshall, C. (2017). Montessori education: A review of the evidence base. NPJ Science of Learning, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-017-0012-7
Nugrahanta, G. A., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Widodo, A. (2023). Contribution of Montessori-based literacy to curiosity character of children aged 7 years. Jurnal Dedikasi Pendidikan, 7(1), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.24114/jdp.v7i1.40432
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press.
Priatna, M. T. (2022). Penelitian tindakan kelas: Teori dan praktik. Tsabita.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Simeru, A., et al. (2023). Model-model pembelajaran. Lakeisha.
Sutoyo. (2020). Teknik penyusunan penelitian tindakan kelas. UNISRI Press.
Wicaksono, D. (2019). Problem-based learning implementation in elementary school. Jurnal Holistika, 3(2), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.24853/holistika.3.2.110-121
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Misnar Dumapuan Lubis, Abd. Manap HT Uruk, Sutan Botung Hasibuan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


